Wi-Fi Combo Forum Discussions

Hi,

With 3.5.2. When connecting to a MQTT broker over wifi, if the network is disconnected the connection to the MQTT broker is not resumed when the network comes back up. I tried different things (bring everything down and back up, reuse the MQTT connection, etc) but I'm not sure the MQTT library handles the broken connection correctly.

Is there a newer version of the SDK I can try or an example on how to do this?

Thank you

Hi,

We have one critical issue, that is system crash after calling the wiced_tcp_delete_socket.

In our application, we have a secured tcp socket which connects to out side Server, and this connection is always connected unless there is network problem or close from Server  or stop from user.

Whenever there is connection close (other than user) we need to re-try connecting to the Server .

We observer that after device is running for few hours and if network is in bad condition sometime we get a 7014 error from wiced_tcp_receive, here we noticed that 7014 is received by the netx_duo , Server or user did not send any TCP disconnect( This 7014 error already looking by Broadcom network engineer).

In our application we retry connection after 10 second, before making new connection with the server we tried to clean the previously created socket. When we tested it works well even after few  creating and deleting few hundreds times, but some times we can see crash after application is running for few hours and getting some un-usual close from netx_duo .

below is the code used for clean Socket .

And we can see the crash after wiced_tcp_delete_socket

        APPLN_LOG_INFO("Socket state is [%d] result [%d]", socket_state, result);

        if(socket->socket_magic_number == WICED_SOCKET_MAGIC_NUMBER && socket->socket.nx_tcp_socket_id !=0) /* delete only if it is not Already deleted*/

          result = wiced_tcp_delete_socket(socket);

With our observation the crash is after calling nx_tcp_socket_disconnect, we verified that socket pointer is not NULL and it is already created.

Please help to debug this crash, our application is rejectd by our testing team to this crticial issue, below is the code related socket delete and Crash Log

wiced_result_t DisConnectSokcet(wiced_tcp_socket_t *sockets)

{

  wiced_socket_state_t socket_state;

  wiced_result_t result = WICED_SUCCESS;

  wiced_tcp_socket_t *socket = NULL;

  int tryCount = 0;

  TRY_AGAIN:

  socket = msgpstmCISocket->tcp_client_socket;

  if(socket != NULL)

  {

    tryCount ++;

    result =
wiced_tcp_get_socket_state( socket, &socket_state );

    if(result == WICED_SUCCESS)

    {

      if (socket_state == WICED_SOCKET_DATA_PENDING &&
tryCount <10)

      {

        SN_SleepTask(1000); /** 10 sec
Wait for socket Transaction*/

        goto TRY_AGAIN;

      }

      else if(socket_state ==WICED_SOCKET_CONNECTED)

      {

        SHPNANO_LOG_INFO("Socket
state [%d] ", socket_state);

        if(socket->socket_magic_number ==
WICED_SOCKET_MAGIC_NUMBER && socket->socket.nx_tcp_socket_id !=0)

          result =  wiced_tcp_disconnect(socket);

        if(result != WICED_SUCCESS)

        {

          SHPNANO_LOG_WARNING("Disconnect
result [%d] ", result);

        }

      }

    }

    else

    {

      SHPNANO_LOG_WARNING("socket
Might Have already Closed [%d] ", socket_state);

    }

  }

  return result;

}

/**

*

* @param socket

*/

void CleanSokcet(wiced_tcp_socket_t *sockets)

{

  SHPNANO_LOG_FUNC_ENTRY();

  wiced_tcp_socket_t * socket =
sockets;

  if(socket != NULL)

  {

    wiced_socket_state_t socket_state;

    wiced_result_t result;

    int tryCount = 0;

    TRY_AGAIN:

    result =
wiced_tcp_get_socket_state( socket, &socket_state );

    tryCount ++;

    if(result == WICED_SUCCESS)

    {

      if(socket_state != WICED_SOCKET_CLOSED)

      {

        SHPNANO_LOG_INFO("Sokcet
state is [%d], Need to wait", socket_state);

        if(tryCount <10)

        {

          SN_SleepTask(1000); /** Standard
Wait for Sokcet Transcation*/

          if(socket_state !=WICED_SOCKET_CLOSING)

            goto TRY_AGAIN;

        }

        DisConnectSokcet(socket);

        //SN_SleepTask(WICED_TCP_DISCONNECT_TIMEOUT)
;/** Standard Wait for Sokcet Disconnection */

        goto TRY_AGAIN;

      }

      if(socket != NULL) /* Added
Double NULL check*/

      {

        result =  wiced_tcp_get_socket_state( socket,
&socket_state );

        SHPNANO_LOG_INFO("Socket
state is [%d] result [%d]", socket_state, result);

        if(socket->socket_magic_number ==
WICED_SOCKET_MAGIC_NUMBER && socket->socket.nx_tcp_socket_id !=0) /* delete only
if it is not Already deleted*/

        {

          SHPNANO_LOG_INFO("Calling
Delete Socket");

          result =
wiced_tcp_delete_socket(socket);

        }

      }

      if(result != WICED_SUCCESS)

      {

        SHPNANO_LOG_WARNING("Delete
Socket Warning [%d]", result);

      }

      //memset(socket, 0 ,
sizeof(wiced_tcp_socket_t));

    }

    else

    {

      SHPNANO_LOG_WARNING("Failed
to get the Socket state [%d] ", result);

    }

  }

  SHPNANO_LOG_FUNC_EXIT();

}

|06:49:27.012|[tid
: 5550672] E palCIServer.c:553|readDataFromNetwork(): Socket return [7014]

|06:49:27.021|[tid
: 5550672] W palCIServer.c:569|readDataFromNetwork(): Packet reception failed
on CI Channel, CI Socket  read return
[7014]

|06:49:27.035|[tid
: 5550672] W palCIServer.c:684|readDataFromNetwork(): Server [52.69.94.74]
Returned empty Response or Connection got Broken

|06:49:27.049|[tid
: 5550672] I CoapServerAdaptor.c:480|CoapResponseHandler(): Respone Code:[731]

|06:49:27.059|[tid
: 5550672] E CoapServerAdaptor.c:543|CoapResponseHandler(): Connection
terminated by ci server :(, Will Try ReConnecting

|06:49:27.073|[tid
: 5550672] D DawitControl.c:216|DeviceConnStatusCallBack():
DeviceConnStatusCallBack [0]

|06:49:27.084|[tid
: 5550672] I CoapUtil.c:310|TryNextReconnectWithRIV(): Timer for [2000] ms

|06:49:27.392|[tid
: 5548832] E CoapClientAdaptor.c:161|CoapClientPost(): Remote Connection for
Coap is not yet Ready

|06:49:27.403|[tid
: 5548832] E SubscriptionManagerUtil.c:149|SendNotification(): Failed to send
Notification..

|06:49:29.084|[tid
: 5550856] D CoapUtil.c:184|CoapEventHandler(): Event : 2

|06:49:29.191|[tid
: 5550856] D CoapServerAdaptor.c:782|RegisterUtil(): CI Registration start

|06:49:30.200|[tid
: 5550856] T CoapServerAdaptor.c:944|__RegisterCI(): Entry

|06:49:30.207|[tid
: 5550856] I palCIServer.c:433|_palSendCIRequest(): Server Connection is not
Alive, Make Sure this is Registration Request

|06:49:30.221|[tid
: 5550856] D palCIServer.c:263|_palDelSocket():
Deleting the CI Server Socket Called

|06:49:30.232|[tid
: 5550856] T palCIServer.c:1095|CleanSocket (): Entry

|06:49:30.239|[tid
: 5550856] I palCIServer.c:1125|CleanSocket (): Socket  state is [0] result [0]

|06:49:30.239|[tid
: 5550856] I palCIServer.c:1127|CleanSocket (): Calling Delete Socket

===
EXCEPTION ===

data_abort_handler

LR   : 0x004F08E9

DFSR :
0x0000080D

DFAR :
0x00000005

IFSR :
0x00000000

IFAR :
0x00000000

CPSR :
0x600001D7

=================

Hi,

Would you provide me information about BCM4343W?

Wihch version of SDK and FW is oldest one which supports BCM4343W?

I found the SDK-3.5.2 (FW version 7.45.45.1) may be oldest. But I couldn't find other SDK-3.5.x on Cypress web sight.

Thanks,

Ken Ryu

Hi,

getting the error "Could not find appropriate Java Runtime Environment (JRE). WICED JRE requires JRE version 1.6.0 or higher..."

I have this installed:

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601] Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved. C:\Users\IBM_ADMIN>java -version java version "1.7.0" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pwi3270sr9fp40-20160422_01(SR9 FP40)) IBM J9 VM (build 2.6, JRE 1.7.0 Windows 7 x86-32 20160406_298397 (JIT enabled, A OT enabled) J9VM - R26_Java726_SR9_20160406_0949_B298397 JIT  - tr.r11_20160328_114192 GC   - R26_Java726_SR9_20160406_0949_B298397 J9CL - 20160406_298397) JCL - 20160421_01 based on Oracle jdk7u101-b14 C:\Users\IBM_ADMIN>

Windows 7 Pro, SP1, 64-bit

How can I tell if it's the "32-bit" error described elsewhere or is this an issue with WICED being too particular about the version reported by the secure IBM Java system?

/Greg