Apr 02, 2020
05:09 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apr 02, 2020
05:09 AM
Will GPIF control signals be dis-asserted when the state machine proceed from a state that assert that signal to a state that doesn't mention that signal? Doesn't the signal needed to be dis-asserted in the next state?
Solved! Go to Solution.
1 Solution
Apr 03, 2020
12:12 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apr 03, 2020
12:12 AM
Hello,
As mentioned in the appnote AN87216, please find the info below:
Regards,
Yashwant
2 Replies
Apr 02, 2020
05:11 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apr 02, 2020
05:11 AM
Doesn't the signal needed to be dis-asserted explicitly in the next state? On the contrast, if a signal is toggled in one state, obviously it won't toggled again in the next state that doesn't mention it. This is a little not consistent.
Apr 03, 2020
12:12 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apr 03, 2020
12:12 AM
Hello,
As mentioned in the appnote AN87216, please find the info below:
Regards,
Yashwant