- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Now, the customer thinks his project will conform to MISRA-C.
But, PDL have many errors to conform.(rule 2.2, 19.10, 16.3, and others)
Also, bt.c have a comment, "Workaround for MISRA-C 2004 rule 12.7".
PDL will seems to conform to MISRA-C.
The customer is confused.
Please tell how does PDL 2.0.2 conform to MISRA-C.
ex. -PDL doesn't conform to MISRA-C.
-PDL conform to MISRA-C expect rule 2.2.
etc...
Best Regards,
Inoue
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Please note that PDL 2.0.2 is not MISRA-C complaint. We are sorry for the inconvinience caused.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
PDL 2.0.2 is not MISRA-C compliant. However, user can modify the available PDL source files for compliance as done in a couple of source files.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi geon,
Can you clarify which rules of MISRA - C PDL 2.0.2 does not comply with?
Best Regards,
Inoue
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Please note that PDL 2.0.2 is not MISRA-C complaint. We are sorry for the inconvinience caused.