AURIX™ Forum Discussions

大家好，我现在手头上有一块KIT_AURIX_TC297_TFT评估板。我刷写了英飞凌官网上的demo，就是Blinky_LED那个程序。我想知道我怎么刷回板子出厂自带的程序。有人能上传一份出厂自带的demo么？

还有就是我在官网上看到这块板子的usb是自带串口的，于是我刷写了UART_VCOM_1_KIT_TC297_TFT这个demo，但是我把usb连接到pc上之后，pc上并没有出现虚拟串口。有人能帮忙分析一下原因么？

Hi everyone, 

Hi @Jeremy_Z ,

I am working on Aurix TC399 and plan to find methods to improve the resolution of the ADC. One approach I'm considering is to adjust the reference voltage with the hope of attaining a higher resolution. As indicated in Figure 93 titled "TC39x Supply Pins and Module Connectivity," such an adjustment appears feasible.

The Aurix TC399 is equipped with two types of ADCs. For the EVADC, there's a choice between a standard (VAREF) and an alternate (CH0) reference voltage source for each channel. This feature is highlighted in section 32.1 "Feature List" of the User Manual. Thus, by applying a reduced reference voltage to CH0, I aim to achieve enhanced resolution. However, the specific steps to make this adjustment for EDSADC remain elusive in the documentation.

I am wondering if the EDSADC does not support an alternate reference voltage.

Can someone give me some guidance on it? Thank you in adavnce

Best regards,

Zheng Tao

Figure 93 TC39x Supply Pins and Module Connectivity (Power Management System (PMS))

How this SCU interface signal -SMU_EMGSTP_REQ is used in TC377? whether it triggers any of the pin in the micro controller or how its handled...??

When i developed a multiple(2) can nodes appilication, can00 and can03. After initial the two nodes, only the can00 operation normal. 

main

{

MCAN_Demo_init(); //can00
MCAN03_Demo_init(); //can03

while(1)
{

  MCAN_Demo_Run(); //CAN00 PASS
  MCAN03_Demo_Run(); //CAN03 NOPASS

}

}

I have tested that when there is only can00 or can03, it worked normal.

only can00:

only can03:

 Based on the illd doc, maybe my can03's messageRAM baseAddress wrong, changed  from

nodeConfig_can03.messageRAM.baseAddress = (uint32) &MODULE_CAN0;

to

nodeConfig_can03.messageRAM.baseAddress = (uint32) &MODULE_CAN0 + NODE3_RAM_OFFSET;

But it not worked. Is there some files or suggestions can help me to correct my code?

I hope to get the help of friends,  I've been stuck with this question for three days

Hello there,

We are designing a custom carrier board based on Aurix series TC397XX256F300SBD MCU. and we are referring to the Infineon-TriBoardManual_TC3X71-UserManual-v02_01-EN schematics and following exactly the schematics. 

In that we are having few doubts:

1. Can we left unconnected the below listed pins of MCU or it should be connected to GND, hence it is named as VSS,

AGBTTX_N/VSS 

AGBTERR/VSS

AGBTTX_P/VSS

AGBTCLK_P/VSS

AGBTCLK_N/VSS

2. In tri-board RTL8211F Phy chip is used, instead we are using KSZ9897RTXI-TR phy chip (RGMII is connected with the chip) in our custom carrier board. will the MCU be compatible with the KSZ9897RTXI-TR chip? 

3. Can Infineon support us with Config files / Header files / Library files to interface with KSZ9897RTXI-TR chip ?

Thanks,

Sakthivel

I am working on configuring the Bus MPU(aka Safety Protection System) on Aurix TC39x. As a dry run, I configured SPR_SPROT_RGNLA0 and SPR_SPROT_RGNUA0 with lower and upper address of 0x70100000

To Test I did the following:

I tried reading from the address 0x70104234 which lies within the lower and upper bounds. 

The issue:

The system allows the read to take place while as per the manual, the trap is expected.

My question:

Is there ways to understand how find out what is the problem? It would be good if you can provide some background info on how to configure the safety protection system(are there any pre-requisites on this? Eg: should the PROTEN of SYSCON be enabled?...and so on)

Background Info:

I use an RTOS and perform all the configs and read operation from Tasks on core0 and core1 in supervisor mode without memory protection enabled.

@NeMa_4793301