Transfer Bandwidth Bulk Split Between Endpoints Better or Worse?

Tip / Sign in to post questions, reply, level up, and achieve exciting badges. Know more

cross mob
FrZa_2625781
Level 4
Level 4
First solution authored 25 replies posted 10 replies posted

Hi,

In order to achieve a maximum continuous bandwidth for bulk transfers with the FX2LP, is it better to use one single endpoint, like EP2 with 512 byte or even 1024 byte quad buffered or is it better to use two endpoints, like EP2 and EP6, each with 512 byte quad buffered?

Transfers are asynchronous bulk transfers with multiple transfers queued in order to always have transfers ready.

Thanks!

 

0 Likes
1 Solution
MallikaK_22
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
50 likes received 750 replies posted 250 solutions authored

Hi,

I think it will be better if you use 2 endpoints. You may also want to use enough buffering to suit bandwidth requirements and for handling the bursty nature of BULK endpoints.

 

View solution in original post

0 Likes
1 Reply
MallikaK_22
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
50 likes received 750 replies posted 250 solutions authored

Hi,

I think it will be better if you use 2 endpoints. You may also want to use enough buffering to suit bandwidth requirements and for handling the bursty nature of BULK endpoints.

 

0 Likes