- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
This is a patamenter about Buffer Capacitor of T5V1 listing in TLE88888-1QK Datasheet.We want to know whether it can be applied beyond the recommended parameters, because the ripple of our power supply will exceed the accuracy range due to the interference of the clock signal, and we must increase the capacitance of 4.7uf to filter it out.Is there any risk if 4.7uf capacitor is used?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
ispn:15161:1:0
-
l1:144:1:0
-
l2:133:1:0
-
l3:136:1:0
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I can't see the risks for using 4.7uF. But I would also recommend for using 100nF near T5V1, and 4.7uF near your power consumption side.
BR,
Steven
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Rina,
Thanks for using Infineon Community.
From my point of view, I don't think there are problems with 4.7uf.
But we can only guarantee all functions with the value in the DS.
Best regards
Steven
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Could you list some possible risk?Such as when and what kind of problem will it happen?If problems happened,where would it be affected?Could you provide some directions?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Rina,
as T5V1 is sensor supply, 400nF is good to filter out high frequency interference. Could you tell more about your circuit (design), or why you use 4.7uF near our IC?
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
because there is some interference of the clock signal that leads to the ripple of our power supply exceeding the accuracy range , and we must increase the capacitance of 4.7uf to filter it out.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Could you provide the related schematic design (Power supply side and T5V1 signal side)?
Steven
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
This is our design for power supply,and now we want to add 4.7uF on T5V1,what kind of risks will it be?So that we can determine whether we need to choose other improvements.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I can't see the risks for using 4.7uF. But I would also recommend for using 100nF near T5V1, and 4.7uF near your power consumption side.
BR,
Steven
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I can understand that if 100nF is placed near t5v1, there is no risk of 4.7uf increase, right?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Here are some other qusetions——If we connect a 1KΩ resistor in series on SDO and CLK,is the value of resistor too large?is there some risk for SPI communication?Do you have recommended values or ranges?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Rina,
If 1kOhm in your previous design had no problem with your data rate requirements. Then it is fine.
1kOhm has an effect on the slew rate.
330Ohm is recommended.
Best regards,
Steven
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
we didn't use 1KOhm in our previous design,and we have measured that the rising edge of the signal slows down but there is no distortion after adding 1kohm. If the waveform of SPI meets the timing requirements of the datasheet, could it be guaranteed that there is no risk?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It should be ok, but you should test on your own application. There's no guarantee.
Steven