PSoC™ 5, 3 & 1 Forum Discussions

Did peak detector on the component subject. We must remember the amplitude of the square pulse duration > 10us.

The component has configured as follows.

- "Sample & Hold"

- "Internal"

- "Falling edge"

Synchronized pulse from the Pulse Converter component, 2us, who was started by digital sygnal under investigation immediately.

On output of Sample & Hold I was see clear 0!

P.S. In main.c component was started, not forgot to do this...

What are high z pins?

I just wanted to know what does High Z mean?? and how provides enough voltage???

 Hi! My name is Jonathan and I use CY8C29466 and CY8C24123 for school's projects.

Last summer I did a little project for my girlfriend and it was the last time I used de PSoC designer. Some days ago I began a project and I noticed that I can´t compile when I used the F6 button. I tried with my old projects and they worked. I tried with my new project and I had problems again. When I tried to use the program part in a old project it didn't work.

So I have installed the PSoC designer 5.4 but it doesn't work. When I try to generate/build it returns me the message: "makehex.exe dejó de funcionar. Windows le avisará si encuentra una solución" I think that it means: "makehex.exe crashed. Windows will send you a note if they find a solution". So I can´t program and I don't understand the reason. It was OK until three days ago.

I know the problem could be windows but does somebody knows the way to solve it?

Hi there !

Does anyone know about an error that apear just when I am editing a souce file  and afterward when you try to build it send you the following message :

prj.M0120:Buld error: syntax error near'{' 

prj.M0120:Buld error: syntax error near '}'

The error is about the following 6 element array :   txbuf[6]= {0xDC,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00};

 This array is defined as  extern uint8 txbuf  in other file.

I would appreciate any help

 Hi, Im giving variable analog input(max rating 5V) to PSoC 5lp in high impedance mode.Now my question is can I directly give the potentiometer input to PSoC?How much resistance does any analog pin provide in this mode? Will the current damage PSoC? 

Right now as precaution i have connected 1k in series with POT,Psoc is taking floating value when i switch the input near to zero volts.The reason being psoc is unable to detect ground because of that 1k ohm.

RISHI

 Hi all,

I'm using CYRF69103 SOC,i have programmed one board and it is working means the the radio is ON, when i programmed the second board it is not working means radio is not ON i confirmed this by checking the o/p vge at radio pin. Actually we have many boards here out of some are working and some are not working. Don't know this is IC problem or not, does anyone faced this issue before?? Looking for replies! Thank you!

Regards

Kiran

I am running the emFile_Example01 on PSoC3 Creator 2.2 while interfacing with the PIC18F24K22 MCU.

This application involves logging data to the SD card with the PIC18 being the main MCU while the PSoC3 is only used (for now) as an SD card data logger using the emFile_V322b data files.

I noticed that in order to write data correctly, the firmware for the PIC must be delayed least 100mS between write to the PSoC3 else data on the SD card can be faulty.  I have read on the web that the average SD card delay-betwen-wrtie time is about 10mS.  This is much more acceptable then 100mS.

Data between PIC18 and PSoC3 is via RS-232 at 9600 baud.

I believe that this is an issue with the emFile_V322b files.  Please advise on how to make data logging faster.

p.s.  if this matters at all which I don't thnik - my PSoC3 PN is: CY8C3866LTI-030.  Again all is working fine but at 100mS delay between write. 

 I have a CY8C24994 chip (QFN68). I understand that I can program it using a MiniProg1 device connected to my PC. But how do I interface the CY8C24994 with the MiniProg1? Are there adaptors available and if yes, where can I find them?

So I built my application in Creator 2.2 for a CY8C38 chip (8kB ram). It says that I've used 15077 of 8192 bytes (184%) of my SRAM. 

I guess I'm confussed that it would bulid without errors and even run if I used 187%. Although I haven't tessted all features during run time. Is this some kind of error or will it let me use that much SRAM and not yell at me? I'll post the project if needed, but it's quite messy at the moment.