Potential Alternatives for CY8C3866AXI-040

Tip / Sign in to post questions, reply, level up, and achieve exciting badges. Know more

cross mob
erich
Level 1
Level 1
First like given First question asked Welcome!

Hi,

I'm using the CY8C3866AXI-040 in a design but I can't seem to find a supplier with out a lead time going out to 1 year+. The same family seems to have the  CY8C3866AXI-039 which seems like a drop-in replacement (we don't use the CAN portion), but I couldn't find any information on any major differences between the two numbers.

Any information would be appreciated.

 


Cheers

0 Likes
1 Solution
Gautami_12
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
50 likes received 100 solutions authored 250 replies posted

Hi @erich,

The major differences between CY8C3866AXI-040 and CY8C3866AXI-039 is presence of CAN 2.0b . As you don't use CAN portion in your project , you can go ahead and use CY8C3866AXI-039 instead of CY8C3866AXI-040 device.  Please refer to the ordering section of the PSoC 3 CY8C38 Programmable System-on-Chip Datasheet.

Gautami_12_0-1658904139531.png

Warm Regards,
Gautami J

 

View solution in original post

1 Reply
Gautami_12
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
50 likes received 100 solutions authored 250 replies posted

Hi @erich,

The major differences between CY8C3866AXI-040 and CY8C3866AXI-039 is presence of CAN 2.0b . As you don't use CAN portion in your project , you can go ahead and use CY8C3866AXI-039 instead of CY8C3866AXI-040 device.  Please refer to the ordering section of the PSoC 3 CY8C38 Programmable System-on-Chip Datasheet.

Gautami_12_0-1658904139531.png

Warm Regards,
Gautami J