S29GL256P10FFI010 leadfree with 63Sn37Pb Spheres

Tip / Sign in to post questions, reply, level up, and achieve exciting badges. Know more

cross mob
Anonymous
Not applicable

Why is there a difference about lead for the S29GL256P10FFI010 ?

The "F" in the part reference indicates leadfree in the datasheet whereas the "S29GL256P Reliability Report"  indicates 63Sn37Pb Spheres for LAA064 package which is not leadfree at all !

Is this part leadfree or not ?

Is it really ROHS ?

0 Likes
1 Solution
Anonymous
Not applicable

Hello Luc,

The qualification report lists SnPb since parts build with SnPb spheres for the actual qualification.  We consider this data relevant to Pb-Free spheres as well because we have extensive experience on this package and others using Pb-Free spheres.  We cannot realistically perform qualifications on all variations of materials for a new product, so instead, we pick a representative package (which, in this case, used SnPb spheres) for the qualification.

Hope the above clarifications clears your doubt.

So S29GL256P10FFI010 is lead free.

Thanks,

Krishna.

View solution in original post

3 Replies
Anonymous
Not applicable

Hello Luc,

Q) Is it really ROHS ?

A) Yes the device S29GL256P10FFI010 is RoHS compliant. Please refer the link below for the confirmation :

http://www.cypress.com/rohs-cc/S29GL256P10FFI010?rohs_compliant=y

Thanks,

Krishna.

0 Likes
Anonymous
Not applicable

Hello Luc,

The qualification report lists SnPb since parts build with SnPb spheres for the actual qualification.  We consider this data relevant to Pb-Free spheres as well because we have extensive experience on this package and others using Pb-Free spheres.  We cannot realistically perform qualifications on all variations of materials for a new product, so instead, we pick a representative package (which, in this case, used SnPb spheres) for the qualification.

Hope the above clarifications clears your doubt.

So S29GL256P10FFI010 is lead free.

Thanks,

Krishna.

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hello,

Thanks for the clarifications, now I have no doubt about the component ROHS status.

Best regards.

Luc

0 Likes