- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dear Sirs and Madams,
We are using the LIN sample project on Github as a reference.
mtb-example-psoc4-lin-slave project URL
https://github.com/Infineon/mtb-example-psoc4-lin-slave
Using the "make getlibs" command and "make eclipse" command, We successfully built and confirmed the operation.
However, there is an unknown point in this project.
When We confirm for "Device configurator", it is not checked under "Peripherals" and "Pins".
[Peripherals]
[Pins]
If it is written in the "resource_ map.h" as shown below, is it possible not to check the corresponding "Peripherals" and "Pins" checkboxes in the device configurator?
[Resource_map.h]
For example, if you check the check boxes for pins P3[0], P3[1], P3[4], P3[6] and P2[6], it will not work properly.
Also, when We would like to use LIN communication in Modus Toolbox , is it possible to use it only if it is described by such a "resource_map.h"?
Please tell us about the relationship between "Device Configurator" and "resource_map.h" in the this "mtb-example-psoc4-lin-slave project".
Regards,
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
ModusToolbox General
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @MiNe_85951 ,,
In the mtb-example-psoc4-lin-slave CE HAL libraries are being used and not PDL.
Hence initializing those pins with device configurator (done for PDL libraries) will cause a conflict.
Regards,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @MiNe_85951 ,,
In the mtb-example-psoc4-lin-slave CE HAL libraries are being used and not PDL.
Hence initializing those pins with device configurator (done for PDL libraries) will cause a conflict.
Regards,