Microcontrollers

Hello,

I want to use Erika on TC397_TFT board. But I didn't find sample project. Could you please help me?

Best regards,

Show Less

Hi,

I would like to use the XMC1402 for PCC of my converter as it has slightly better PWM resolution and CAN support. However, I see that the DAVE app BUCK_PCC_FIX_FQ is not compatible with the XMC1400. Is there any restriction with XMC1400 that prevents this?

Is manually porting from XMC1300 code to XMC1400 a possible solution for this limitation?

Regards,

Tarun

Show Less

I'm attempting to load the Setup Package for CY8CKIT062WiFiBT

DOWNLOAD - CY8CKIT062WiFiBTSetupOnlyPackage_RevSS.exe

The process stops with a note that the PDL 3.0 is missing

I have PDL 3.1 loaded.

The "Download" button for PDL 3.0 sends me to a 401 error - page not found

Reference: https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/design-support/software/device-driver-libraries/psoc-6-peripheral-driver-library-pdl-for-psoc-creator/

Greg

 

Show Less

Hello,

I am looking to make a tiny bot using CY8C4745LQI-S411. I was planning to directly connect it to a 3.7V battery and utilize the internal regulator of the chip. Just wanted to verify if I will require any voltage regulator or protection circuits.

Also, what is the difference between psoc programmer and psoc Creator? I have a Miniprog4 to program the chip, but should I use a psoc creator or programmer for the same?

Any type of help is appreciated!

 

Thanks!

 

Show Less

Hello,

I'm planing to develop an ISO26262-compliant module to achieve ASIL-B and also need cyber security.

I see from the AURIX safety manual (page 18, V1.5) that HSM is non-safety part.
I'm a bit puzzled about this. For example, CAN FD encrypted communication (AP32330). From Fig 11 we can see the bare data is sent to HSM to generate encrypted data, then it go to can module to send out.
I'm wondering if HSM has sorts of fault, generate an incorrect encrypted data. The data is loaded into CAN FD frame with CRC and sent out.Then the receiver could trust this data since the CRC in CAN FD protocol is correct. This could cause a safety goal violation.
Unlike CRC, I suppose e.g. AES in HSM will not generate redundant bits which can be used to check data integrity.
So it seems the HSM module should be safety related and need diagnostic during run time?
Could you tell me what is the mitigation? Show Less

Hi

Alm6[19-21] is meant for the modules below

 

I have cleared the corresponding MTU alarms, but the SMU alarm 6[20] is not getting cleared

Any suggestion

 

Thanks

Show Less

Hey all,

I'm looking into interfacing a PSoC5LP to a bit of a strange I2C Master.  Rather than being designed to run on a bus, I have to interface using SDA/SCL and an INT pin in a "point to point" configuration.  The idea is easy enough, it gives a edge on the INT line, I catch it with the PSoC, and read the 9 data bytes that it sends, but there's a twist. 

The catch is this device does not send an address, just the raw data bytes.  How can I adjust the SI2C to account for this?  I see I can use either Software/Hardware address decoding.  Hardware is probably out of the question since there's just no address at all.

This leaves me with software decoding, in which case it seems like modifying the ISR in SI2C_INT.c to just drop bytes immediately into the buffer rather than doing a check on the address might work.  Maybe some custom code placed in the SI2C_SW_ADDR_COMPARE_interruptStart code block in the ISR?  I could maybe set the "expected address" to something that should never occur as the first byte received (would need to see if this is possible, it only has 1 bit of data, the rest are "Reserved", so maybe they'll read all 0?  That would make it easy.) so it will drop into the address compare where I can drop my custom code to place the data in the receive buffer rather than use it as an address?

An easier option after looking further may be just to use the SI2C_ISR_EntryCallback(); and have it perform essentially a modified version of the stock Slave I2C code.

I'd be interested if anyone out there had any better options, maybe even something that just works in hardware?

Thanks!

Show Less

because github cannot be accessed in my office, I have to use offline content.

Show Less

We are having connection stability issues while using CYBLE-012011-00 EZ-BLE Creator Module in our device when communicating with our iOS app.

The problem we were seeing was our device and the phone app would irregularly disconnect, even while idle and in close proximity. The error message the Bluetooth module throws is “0x08: Instant Passed.” We have done our best to optimize our setup including repositioning the module on the pcb and adjusting the connection parameters.

While we have gotten improved performance, we still occasionally get random dropouts/disconnects when the app and our device are communicating with a high frequency of messages i.e. connection is more stable with a lower message interval but degrades the more frequently we send messages.

We would appreciate suggestions to resolve this such that these random disconnects no longer occur unexpectedly.

 

Thanks,

Tim

Show Less