IAUS240N08S5N019 device marking

Announcements

Live Webinar: Solving the challenges in xEV power conversions | March 7 @9am & 5pm CET. Register now!

Tip / Sign in to post questions, reply, level up, and achieve exciting badges. Know more

cross mob
lock attach
Attachments are accessible only for community members.
Rustem
Level 1
Level 1
First like given First reply posted First question asked

Hi!

We have IAUS240N08S5N019 transistor with the next marking on package "5N08019" (see photo below). According to the datasheet, IAUS240N08S5N019 model should have a package marking "A08S5N19". Package appearance and dimensions same as PG-HSOG-8-1. But "5N08019" marking corresponds IAUT240N08S5N019 model in PG-HSOF-8-1 package. Please tell me where is the mistake? Did we get a counterfeit?

0 Likes
1 Solution
vigneshkumar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
250 sign-ins 50 solutions authored 100 replies posted

Hi Rustem,

Thanks for your Patience.

Body Marking has been Verified. It is not counterfeit. It happened due to the mismatch in internal data. Action will be taken to resolve this in upcoming production.

Thank you again for notify the issue.

Regards

Vignesh kumar.

View solution in original post

4 Replies
vigneshkumar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
250 sign-ins 50 solutions authored 100 replies posted

Hi Rustem,

Thanks for posting on Infineon Community ,

Could you please share the delivery notes?

 

Regards,

Vignesh kumar.

 

0 Likes

Thanks for reply.
Unfortunately, I don't have an delivery notes (I'm afraid we won't find it). But we usually buy everything from Digikey or Mouser (USA/Canada). 

0 Likes
vigneshkumar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
250 sign-ins 50 solutions authored 100 replies posted

Hi,

We need some information to help you, Did you receive anything like the image attached.

vigneshkumar_0-1659591700576.png

Regards,

Vignesh kumar

0 Likes
vigneshkumar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
250 sign-ins 50 solutions authored 100 replies posted

Hi Rustem,

Thanks for your Patience.

Body Marking has been Verified. It is not counterfeit. It happened due to the mismatch in internal data. Action will be taken to resolve this in upcoming production.

Thank you again for notify the issue.

Regards

Vignesh kumar.