Legacy microcontrollers Forum Discussions
text.format{('custom.tabs.no.results')}
Hi all, we use the following version of the Softune Workbench:
- F2MC-16 Family SOFTUNE Workbench V30L35
- Cpu information file version = 19,30,01_2010.07.15
in order to produce our final output (*.mhx) to deploy on our machines.
Due to the large number of *.mhx to produce (we have several machines and models)
we developed an external automated build tool that call the Softune Workbench via command line after preparing all the necessary options. To be sure everything works we compare the .mhx file generated launching Softune manually vs the automated Tool. So far so good , we always got the same output. Recently, because space problems, we changed the compiler optimization level (General purpose optimization level) from Speed priority to Level 1. Now the outputs (*.mhx) always differ between manual and automated build. We don't understand why beacuse the automated build tool parse the project file dinamically in order to retrieve all the configurations. It seems that changing optimization level cause some hidden operation (or parameter) in softune Environment we are not able to catch. Any idea on that? Thanks for any help
Hi all,
We cannot find EOL MCU differences.
I undestood that these parts are EOLed and cannot ask easily, but customer would ike to have information.
it is helpful if someone asnwer the assemlby site and other differences (if any).
# | Part Number | Assembly site | Other difference |
1 | MB90F882ASPMC-G-JNE1 | ||
2 | MB90F882ASPMC-G-N9E1 | ||
3 | MB90F882ASPMC-G-N2E1 | ||
4 | MB90F882ASPMC-GE1 | ||
5 | CY90F882ASPMC-GE1 |
Hi,
We have a popular legacy product which uses the CY7C53150 Neuron chip.
The issue we are facing is, the recommended EEPROM part "Atmel AT29C512" got obsolete and we could not find any stock. We need to find the replacement memory chip urgently.
Or is there any configuration setting available on the Neuron chip side (Node Builder) which we can alter so that, the 3150 Neuron chip will work with other available EEPROMs? We need your technical expert advice on this.
Similar issue has been already discussed in the below thread, but I couldn't find any solution:
I hope you can help us in resolving the issue on urgent basis.
Thanks in advance.
Show LessHow to calculate almost full and almost empty flags of the Asynchronous FIFO? My design is refer the paper: http://www.sunburst-design.com/papers/CummingsSNUG2002SJ_FIFO1.pdf
Show LessHello,
I would like to know a difference between the XC200 MCU family (automotive) vs XE166 MCU (industrial).
What is the difference in testing procedures which defines the qualification for industrial/automotive field?
Show Less
Please tell me the difference between the two titles and model numbers.
Hello.
About Multifunction timer setting for starting PWM output
According to document(32-Bit_Microcontroller_FM4_Family_Peripheral_Manual_Timer_Part: 002-04858) on page474, this setting is following.
1.Initial setting Set FRT operating mode (FRT control register other than TCSA.STOP). Set OCU operating mode and initialize the output level (OCU control register other than OCSA.CST0 and OCSA.CST1). Set the OCCP compare value (writing the OCCP value).
2.Start FRT count operation (writing 0 to TCSA:STOP).
3.Enable OCU's operation (writing 1 to OCSA:CST0 and OCSA:CST1).
(question)
At that time, is there any problem if the processes of 2 and 3 are performed in reverse?
(2.Start FRT count <-> 3.Enable OCU's)
My customer has a concern as following.
“They think when timer count is started and is matched with trigger count before enable OCU's operation, PWM won’t be output.”
Regards,
Tao2199
Show LessI have a created hardware communicating application using RS232 protocol in MFC. But as there is problem regarding voltage signal strength, i would like to shift from RS232 to TCP/IP.
Can anyone help me on this topic...?
Show LessDear colleagues,
Recently I stumbled on former Cypress Semiconductors microcontroller, old type - CY96F613RB, on the board, which I am trying to revive. Suspect that the controller could have issues with firmware or memory, so thinking about reuploading the firmware. That should not be hard to do with ISP - there are 4 pins routed on the board, marked +5V, SIN, SOT, GND. SIN and SOT routed to pins 7 (SIN2) and 8 (SOT2). Also there is a debug port, from pin 17 (Debug I/F). I checked in the Infineon site, found two available ISP programmers, but not sure if any of them is compatible - for some reason I did not found the compatible ICs list for the programmers, as this controller is quite old - please, recommend the programmer for this particular controller.
Best regards
Dennis
Show Less