MA12040 - Sensitivity to Failure

Tip / Sign in to post questions, reply, level up, and achieve exciting badges. Know more

cross mob
mattw2727
Level 1
Level 1
First reply posted First question asked Welcome!

We are currently experiencing a high failure rate among the MA12040 amp ics used in the following circuit:

mattw2727_0-1680297462396.png

We are currently configured for a full bridge tied load (R45 and R44 are populated and L3 and L4 are not) - all output is going to J8.  PVDD is between 12V and 18V.

This design is producing subjectively good audio output results - but it seems highly sensitive to electrical failure.  We're seeing amp ics fail from time to time with no obvious cause.   There have been a couple which failed due to shorts between a pair of adjacent capacitors (C42 - C46) -- but even when no obvious stress occurred we're getting a number of failures with similar outcomes (IC internally shorted).

A couple questions: is there anything about this design that could explain this sensitivity  - and/or should be remedied to improve performance?  Is there anything about the new MA12070 amp IC that will improve this issue?

Thanks very much for any insights / input.

 

0 Likes
1 Solution
amusz
Employee
Employee
25 replies posted 25 sign-ins 10 solutions authored

Hi  @mattw2727 ,

The errata sheet items apply for both MA12040 and MA12070. If the application does not require higher supply voltages than 18V DC (+ it's ripple, for instance max 20V) we still recommend MA2304DNS or MA2304PNS as it has better performance as well in terms of efficiency, idle power consumption, residual noise, etc...

Best regards

View solution in original post

0 Likes
3 Replies
amusz
Employee
Employee
25 replies posted 25 sign-ins 10 solutions authored

Hello @mattw2727 ,

This might be related to item 1.3 in the errata sheet. The PVDD rump up speed should be always lower than 0.25V/uS. This can be easily solved with a series 100mOhm/200mOhm resistor between P18V0 and C47 to build an RC constant when PVDD goes up. 

On a separate note, for 18V products we strongly recommend MA2304DNS or MA2304PNS as MA12040P is not recommended for new designs, unless the analog input is needed.

Best regards

 

0 Likes

Thanks for this initial response  - we are moving to the MA12070 part - is there any caution there?  Or would you recommend it as well (in addition to the MA2304DNS and MA2304PNS parts you mentioned)?

0 Likes
amusz
Employee
Employee
25 replies posted 25 sign-ins 10 solutions authored

Hi  @mattw2727 ,

The errata sheet items apply for both MA12040 and MA12070. If the application does not require higher supply voltages than 18V DC (+ it's ripple, for instance max 20V) we still recommend MA2304DNS or MA2304PNS as it has better performance as well in terms of efficiency, idle power consumption, residual noise, etc...

Best regards

0 Likes