SRRC adaptivity test with CYW4343W(LBT,DAA)_2nd

[JooHoon]

Hi, @BragadeeshV 

I couldn't answer the existing question, so please understand that I am inquiring with a new post.

Previous question : Solved: SRRC adaptivity test with CYW4343W(LBT,DAA) - Infineon Developer Community

I'd like to get final confirmation of the contents of the SRRC adaptivty application for CYW4343W.

I checked the DAA (FHSS) as you guided me before
I also checked the adaptive item below with DAA.

I'm sorry to bother you, but could you check if it's okay to proceed as it is?

Best Regards,

[BragadeeshV]

Hi @JooHoon ,

Could you please clarify if you are testing for BR/EDR only or both BR/EDR and BLE?

[JooHoon]

Hi, @BragadeeshV 

In this PJT, there is no plan to use BLE.(only WiFi feature will be used)

Best Regards,

[BragadeeshV]

Hi @JooHoon ,

All items filled look fine.

The dwell time depends on the packet type used, the maximum is 315 ms for 5 slot packet types.

Number of hopping frequencies = 79

Minimum number of hopping frequencies = 20

[JooHoon]

Hi, @BragadeeshV 

I also checked with Murata internally, and the opinion on LBT or DAA was different from your comment.

I'm sorry to bother you, but could you give me your opinion?

<Murata's opinion>
For WiFi, it is recommended to use Non-FHSS based on murata's ETSI certification exeprience.
Also, it is better to prioritize non-FHSS-Load-Based (LBT) over DAA.
In this time, the customer's PJT only WiFi, so the setting may be a little different.
As a result, It seems better to check both LBT and DAA. (as below)

I'm sorry to bother you, but could you check again?

Best Regards,

JooHoon

[BragadeeshV]

Hi @JooHoon ,

We provided those values for BR/EDR not WiFi. We will check internally and get back to you. Apologies for the confusion.

[JooHoon]

Hi @BragadeeshV,

Do you have any update on this case?

Best Regards,

JooHoon